Wednesday, April 8, 2015

Bellringer 4-8

I agree with these choices. I believe that Eleanor Roosevelt will be the one they put on the $20 though because she was a very influential woman and had a huge impact of woman's rights.

Wednesday, April 1, 2015

4-1

I think it's a kinda stupid idea, pets don't need movies to watch. They can entertain themselves and don't exactly watch TV? Plus its an April Fool's joke

Thursday, March 26, 2015

3-26

I agree with the court because if they had room for her or other people that work the same thing for injuries then she should have the same rights.

Monday, March 23, 2015

bellringer 3-23

I feel like it shouldn't happen. I understand the reasoning behind it but I don't agree. If you change it the people who are 18, 19, and 20 are still going to do it because they are already addicted changing the age isn't going to stop the addiction.

Friday, September 26, 2014

9-26

It indicates to me that people here don't have enough money to pay for college or they just don't care enough to get one. It's so low because people can't afford the prices of college. Also we need to push the importance of college and how you need it to really do anything in life anymore. We could lower the prices of college and we could stress the importance of college more while kids are still in high school.

Tuesday, September 16, 2014

9-16 bellringer

1. I believe that kids should be whipped for misbehaving. Today we are too easy on kids when they do something wrong. All we do is smack them on the hand and tell them not to do it again and that just isn't enough. There, in my eyes, is nothing wrong with whipping your child as long as it doesn't get out of hand. Once with a belt would be more than enough. 2. Views have changed quite a bit over the years. We are now afraid to discipline our kids unlike 20 years ago when your kid misbehaved their parent would beat their butt for it. Now we just baby them and make them think that what they are doing is okay. It needs to change or society will only get worse.

Friday, August 29, 2014

bellringer 8-29

1. Who is to blame for this accident? 2. Should nine year old children be able to shoot guns at a rifle range? 3. Do you feel that uzis and other automatic weapons ever belong in the hands of children? Or in the hands of any human as a matter of fact? I think the person to blame is whoever decide to give a nine year old girl that powerful of a gun, that never should have happened. Yes they should be able to shoot guns but they should not be able to shoot that high powered of a weapon. I feel that they should never be in the hands of a child no matter what, even if a professional is right there helping out. It can be in the hands of humans if they know how to use it and aren't irresponsible in using them.